Is going
paperless, or nearly paperless, for your
wedding ceremony a good idea?
In recent years, the use of tablets and
smartphones in weddings has grown
exponentially. Almost everyone, from
schoolkids to seniors, has at least one for
personal use, and they are ubiquitous in the
workplace.
So, logical progression, celebrants have
started using these digital devices to read
the ceremony and sign necessary paperwork, and
couples may well read their vows, and their
speeches, from their phones.
This trend is promoted as eco-friendly,
practical, and efficient as it removes the
need for printing copies of the ceremony and
paperwork.
Using devices for signing marriage
certificates and reading the ceremony can
offer several benefits. However, there
are also some drawbacks. These drawbacks, in
my view, not only far outweigh the assumed or
perceived benefits environmental benefits,
they include a significant emotional element.
Pen
vs Device: The
Tangible Joy
of Signing
your Marriage
Certificate
Add
The
way you sign your marriage certificates has a
significant impact on the emotional and
sensual pleasure of the experience! The
silkiness of good paper under your hands, the
smooth flow of ink on paper that creates a
sense of intimacy of of permanence, adds an
extra layer of significance and tradition to
the act of signing, and can create a subtle
feeling of tangible joy and sensous pleasure
that can't be duplicated by a stylus on a
device screen.
Signing on a device is pretty mundane. It is
how we confirm deliveries. It is impersonal.
As signing on paper becomes a rarer
experience, one not often experienced in
normal daily life, doing so becomes more
significant.
From a practical point of view, the Marriage
Act requires that each marrying couple is
handed the Presentation Certificate at the
conclusion of their marriage ceremony. This
means that has to be a paper certificate. If
you must sign one piece of paper, why
complicate the signing by using two different
methods?
Digital
signatures are
horrible!
Add
When signing with a stylus, the
resulting signature may not resemble our usual
handwriting. This is due to the different feel
and texture of the stylus on a screen compared
to a pen on paper. Additionally, the angle and
pressure at which the stylus is held may
affect the appearance of the signature.
If you are going to sign on a device you
really need to practice your signature using
the same type of device and the same type of
stylus, and each of you may need different
adjustments to settings such as pen pressure.
Reason
for the order
of signing
Add
If you pay close attention at one of
my weddings, you will notice that I get the
couple and their witnesses to sign in a
particular order.
Signing three times, on paper, gives you a
chance to deal with the impact of slightly
shaking hands (nervous excitement), so that
when it comes to signing for the third time,
you've settled down and your signature looks
confident and "normal". Which is why I get
you to sign the copy I have to keep first
(the Register), then the copy that goes into
Births, Deaths, and Marriages, and lastly,
the Presentation Certificate, the one you
keep for the rest of your lives.
It's a smooth operation. Throw a digital
device into the mix and it becomes a more
bumpy ride.
Risk
Management
Add
From the celebrant's point of view, going
paperless for a wedding ceremony can be a
great eco-friendly option, but there are some
risks to consider.
One of the biggest concerns is the possibility
of the electronic device failing or running
out of battery, preventing access to the
ceremony script and certificates. But issues
of security, the possibility of the device
being hacked, or the document being corrupted
also pose a level of risk that is concerning.
Most celebrants who use devices have an
alternative in case of connectivity issues - a
printed copy of the ceremony script and
certificates!
A
matter of
gravitas - how
real will it
feel
Addimm