All
wedding ceremonies are wonderful. I say that
with absolute conviction because I have loved the
experience of creating and performing every single
one of the hundreds of marriage ceremonies I've
conducted, both big and small, from the great big
white wedding with all the bells and whistles to
the very basic "legals only" ceremony for couples
who really just want to get the paperwork done.
But I have a special fondness for officiating
elopement ceremonies, and for the very particular
intimacy that flows from being being able to focus
the ceremony entirely
on you, the marrying
couple, rather than a ceremony that, in order to
make sure that your guests feel included,
needs to be, in a large part,
about you,
the marrying couple. The distinction might sound
subtle, but the ambience is chalk and cheese.
So, for me, the restriction on the number of
people at a wedding brought in as part of social
distancing hasn't been a challenge. However, it
does sadden me that the current "Rule of Five"
weddings are somehow being regarded to be very
much a second-best alternative. I argue that these
weddings, where the minimum number of people
necessary for a marriage to be legal (five) is now
the maximum number of people allowed to be at the
wedding, are not somehow a diminished experience
but rather just a different one. And different in
a positive way.
"Rule of Five" doesn't
mean legals only
out
It is my impression that most people in the
wedding industry are interpreting the Rule of Five
restrictions to mean a quickie, legals only,
ceremony because the couple will be planning to
have their "real" wedding and big ceremony and
celebration down the track when things return to
"normal". When all that is being offered is a
bare-bones ceremony, the assumption becomes a
self-fulfilling prophecy, because people needing
or wanted to legally marry settle for it. And is
totally unnecessary. There are no restrictions on
ceremony content. And there never has been any
determination that romance should be rationed!
The absence of guests
allows you to be more active participants in
your ceremony
out
Let's face it, in most wedding ceremonies the
celebrant's ceremonial role is largely that of the
narrator. The ceremonies are
about the
couple -
as in you are talked about. Your
story is told, in the third person. Your parents
are asked if they support your marriage. You are
asked whether you accept one another as
husband/wife. It is the celebrant who is
centre-stage for everything except your vows,
rings, and kiss
, the three parts of the
ceremony that you are the active participants in.
With no guests to include, your "Rule of Five"
(aka ISO) marriage ceremony can be more of a
conversation, with, if you wish, the two of you
taking the leading roles
.
Your personal promises
can be as long as you like
out
When your wedding is a larger one, it is common to
be advised to keep your vows short, both to
contain the length of the ceremony to allow a
decent chunk of time for the telling of your story
and so that the guests don't get restless. When
your vows truly become the heart and soul of the
ceremony, those constraints disappear.
You can include private
jokes without mystifying anyone
out
One of the things I'm loving about ISO weddings is
that couples are so much more relaxed about
content because there is going to be no-one
present who might judge them. One of the ways that
is manifesting is the number of times I'm hearing
references to private jokes. I don't understand
them. I'm not sure whether the witnesses do. But
that doesn't matter. Including a private joke, a
word or two that only has meaning to you, or a
secret hand signal, adds to the intimacy of the
moment.
You can include a
ritual, or two, or three, without having to
explain it
out
When you include a ritual in a wedding where you
have many guests, some sort of explanation as to
what you are doing and what the ritual symbolises
is usually necessary if you want to avoid puzzled
expressions and perhaps the odd eye-roll. For a
ritual to enhance a ceremony it needs to have some
connection to you. Cultural rituals link with who
you are and where you come from. Unity rituals
provide a visual emphasis to the verbal statements
of commitment that create your marriage. Being
able to include a ritual without an explanation
increases its emotional impact and symbolic
potency because you are immersed in it.
You can be as soppy,
silly, or straight to the point as you like
out
The fantastic thing about a "Rule of Five" wedding
is that there are nobody's expectations to
meet, nobody to tell you that if you don't
do this, that, or the other you won't be
"properly" married. And no-one to guilt you into
spending money you don't have on things you don't
need. If you are a down-to-earth couple, there are
no "romantic" expectations to be met. If you are
incredibly mushy and soppy with one another in
private, there is nobody present for whom you
would be expected to tone it down. And if being
downright silly is the way your express your love
for one another, you are free to just be
yourselves.
And later, if you want
to ...
out
You can have another non-legal wedding ceremony
and celebration to share with everyone you
couldn't include the first time round. And that
ceremony can also be romantic, and fun, and
personal. Romance should not be rationed!
More useful information
out
Thanks for reading!