Earlier this
week I solemnised the marriage of two people who
are clearly, obviously, blissfully (even giddily)
in love. And guess what. They didn't kiss. I knew
they weren't going to because it is always a
question I ask. In fact they didn't stand side by
side. They sat on opposite sides of my dining
table, with me at the end and their two witnesses
seated next to them.
When I pronounced them married, he stretched his
arm across the table (it's very wide) and she did
the same, and they locked hands and eyes. Romantic
and intense. And then he stood up, leaned over,
and kissed her hand, to everyone's delight.
Kissing - why everyone
thinks it is a must include
Sealed with a kiss. You may kiss your bride.
etc etc. Every Hollywood movie wedding, every TV
soap wedding, almost every civil ceremony, and
even those solemnised in church end this way.
BUT, here is the big but, it is NOT a legal
requirement. You'll be just as much married if you
don't choose to lock lips.
Unfortunately, not every celebrant knows this.
Many years ago I overheard a conversation at a
gathering of celebrants in which a celebrant of
some years standing was expressing his frustration
about a couple who he said he had almost to force
them to kiss. Lots of nods and tutting from
others. Until I asked a simple question. The
reason for their reluctance became obvious. PDA's
are a huge no-no in their culture.
So why do we assume
that kissing is mandatory?
Blame Hollywood again! Or to quote Fr John
Hunwicke, the legendary Anglican priest and
schoolmaster who converted to Catholicism late in
life, when responding to a groom who asked
"Father ... when do we get the bit
about You May Now Kiss the Bride?" "You don't, it's a revoltingly naff
American custom. We don't do it over here."
Most people in Australia have little or no
experience of a church wedding. Nor do they
realise that there was a watershed moment sometime
in about the 1970s - possibly to do with the
importation of American soap operas on which
weddings were a frequent part of story-lines -
when Australia weddings pivoted from following
English protocol to American, the most obvious
being the switch to bridesmaids in first rather
than following the bride. And, of course, the
ubiquitous kiss!
If you go back in history there are three
significant facts about kissing in marriage
ceremonies that seem to have slipped through the
cracks of folk memory.
1. Way back when, in Ancient Rome, marriage was a
secular contract entered into by two families, and
there were no handy EFTPOS machines or printed
receipts, the accepted way of sealing a bargain or
contract of any kind, was for the buyer and the
seller to share a chaste, and public kiss.
Basically, anyone witnessing that kiss could see
that a deal had been done. Today, marriage
is a secular contract entered into by two adult
people, and recognised by the law of the land.
2. The Sign of Peace, originally referred to as
the Kiss of Peace, is an ancient rite
* that
originated among the first Christians. In
weddings, the first kiss was when the priest
kissed the groom, who then kissed the bride. This
was significant because in some places,
clergy only greeted clergy, men only men, and
women only women, while in other places, everyone
was greeted. And then, it disappeared for
centuries, only reappearing in Catholic Church
services as part of the liturgical reforms
initiated by Vatican II when it was restored
to the Roman missal in 1970.
*so ancient, in fact, that the Irish
word for “kiss,” póg, derives
from the Latin “pax” thanks to this ceremony.
Interestingly, the Anglican Church of Canada
marriage service includes right at the end, the
minister saying "
The peace of the Lord be
always with you" to which the people reply "
And
also with you" followed by the comment, "The
newly married couple may greet each other".
3. The Church of England wedding ceremony (on
which our secular weddings are based) does not
include a kiss! And never did. For those marrying
in England and Wales, the service as per the
1662 prayer book, or the slightly updated version
of it used in William and Kate's royal wedding,
together with the service as per the year 2000
version of the Book of Common Prayer, don't
include it. The priest declares that the couple is
married and, in the updated and later versions
joins their right hands and says
Those whom
God hath joined together let no man put asunder.
Which, in case you've wondered, is why that kiss
on the Buckingham Palace balcony was so
significant!
The way it is in
Australia
Fast forward to the 21st century, and, while
the format of the Church of England (Anglican)
wedding ceremony still holds sway over many civil
ceremonies in Australia, it appears that there has
been some influence the other way. I've seen
versions of the Anglican marriage service that do
include a permission to the groom to kiss the
bride.
However, the Marriage Act makes no mention of
kissing. And where the Marriage Act is silent, you
can be confident that there is no legal
requirement.
So, if, for whatever reason, you do not wish to
kiss, you don't have to.
Last word: If you do
kiss in your wedding, it is not a PDA
Let's cycle back to the idea of a wedding
kiss being the sealing of a contract. Therefore,
keep the kiss chaste - or G rated. A kiss can be
many things - a hello, a goodbye, a sign of
respect, of friendship, of affection. It can be
aggressive or dominating. It can be sweet. It can
be tentative. It can be chaste, or a prelude to
full-on sex.
There is a reason for my frequent admonition to
couples - not a rule, I say, just very strongly
worded words of advice - No Tongue, No Bum, No
Chewing Gum. And that also means no Dip (that's a
dance move that requires lots of practice, so keep
it for your amazing, choreographed first dance)
Related information
Check out the the
Wedding
Ceremony section of this blog for lots more
inspiration